ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 紀要論文
  2. 国際教養学論集
  3. 第5号(1995.10)

60年代の非同盟

https://keiai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1486
https://keiai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1486
81641ffd-467b-4b08-a649-cd3ec4e5b694
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KJ00004438855.pdf KJ00004438855.pdf (985.0 kB)
license.icon
Item type [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2016-08-18
タイトル
タイトル 60年代の非同盟
タイトル
タイトル Non-alignment in the 1960's
言語 en
言語
言語 jpn
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
雑誌書誌ID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN1038070X
著者 柴田, 純志

× 柴田, 純志

柴田, 純志

ja-Kana シバタ, ジュンジ

Search repository
Shibata, Junji

× Shibata, Junji

en Shibata, Junji

Search repository
著者所属(日)
国際教養科
抄録(英)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 The non-aligned movement in the 1960's was unique in its independence from not only the Afro-Asian movement but also from the non-aligned movement after the 1970's. To be sure, the later non-aligned movement took over many ideas from the AA movement. But the real origin of non-alignment was when Tito, Nasser and Nehru, who took the initiative in the movement, strengthened their relationship in the second half of the 1950's. It is usually taken for granted that non-alignment assumed the mantle of authority from the AA movement, due to the strong considerations of the ideological side of non-alignment. However, if attention is given not solely to the ideological side but to the movement itself, it is natural to view non-alignment as independent of the AA movement. The non-aligned movement in the 1960's is clearly different from the movement after the 1970's. A feature of the movement in the 1960's was that the non-aligned countries did not exercise unilateral control over other members. This made them more influential in international politics. However, in the second half of the 1960's, the movement reached a deadlock because of this attitude. As a result of lessons learned from this experience, the non-aligned countries organized themselves after 1970. In the 1970's, the non-aligned countries renewed their movement by abandoning features of the 1960's movement which had impeded progress. Thus, the non-aligned movement in the 1960's found itself in a unique position in international politics. The two conferences of non-aligned countries held in the 1960's (Belgrade, 1961 and Cairo, 1964) differed significantly, owing to the change in the international environment over the intervening three years. The Belgrade Conference adopted a declaration which focussed on the problem of "war and peace" rather than "anti-colonialism", while "anti-colonialism" was a principle focus of the Cairo Conference. But anti-colonialism in Belgrade had a different meaning from that in Cairo. In 1961 current problems included wars in Algeria and Congo, giving the term anti-colonialism a definite anti-West conotation. By 1964 there were many fewer interventions by western states in Africa and Asia, and so anti-colonialism no longer had anti-western implications. The transition from Belgrade to Cairo is very important, as it led to that revival of the non-aligned movement after the 1970's.
書誌情報 国際教養学論集
en : Journal of International Liberal Arts

号 5, p. 111-131, 発行日 1995-10-30
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 10:27:27.467520
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3